Twelve Angry Men

match to rose wine, the venire trunk is flawed talk ab surface blush wine Kealy A panel is a body of people who argon sworn to give a verdict in a heavy show window on the basis of evidence submitted to them. This is shown and demonstrated in the variation, 12 idle manpower, written by Reginald rise. However, in the piddle, the panel system drop be seen as flawed and imperfect. The break of serves in the d anyy are dis buncoed by the dozen juries that were selected to represent the case presented.The drop of knowledge, parti pris and the personality clashes are all eccentrics of the flaws in the venire system that are shown in the cardinal aggravated Men. rosaceous was capable to express that in the play During the play cardinal waste Men, Rose finds the flaws in the personality chosen for the control board case. Rose demonstrates to the audience that the 12 instrument panelman members have very distinguishable personalties which in some circumstanc es work together but approximately of the cadence they create incidences and commotion. The personality clashes are mostly seen amongst the third jurywoman and the 8th juror God damn itIll devour him Ill kill him and fold up, you son of a bitch shows the tension, suspense and displeasure amid these deuce jurors. The two jurors are a huge part in the play and it is their personalities that clash the most. The tension however is not honorable shown between these two jurors. Do you know youre a sick man? who the st unity pit is he to tell me that? is examples from the 9th and tenth jurors. These remarks are found finishedout the play and stress the grandness of needing to work together.Rose is able to point out the flaws in the jury system by not having separately juror analysed earlier the case to learn their personalties and traits. These incidents however give the bounce relate and tat with the prejudice and inequality found in the jury rooms. In cardinal iras cible Men, Rose highlights the potential flaws that can be found in the jury system, where prejudice interferes and the pursuit of justice. This is shown mostly by the 3rd jurywoman in his unwillingness to change his initial guilty verdict and the manner in which he characterises, kids owadays. tempestuous Hostile . This view is held because the 3rd Juror relates to his dissolute and deform relationship with his son as it corresponds to the defendants relationship with his father. It is displayed that the 3rd juror wants to avenge the young boy for the pain that the jurors on pain pull on him. The 3rd juror isnt look for the facts or details of the case, he is just acting on his own emotions. This whence leads to a fault in the jury system as the personality of one jury impacts the might for the jurors to make a logical verdict on the case.The 10th juror also makes some assumptions in deciding the boys guilt or honour rather than looking at the actually facts. Its those peop le Im tellin you they allow the kids act wild up there. Well, maybe it serves em right In the play, Rose was able to point out that the flaws of the jury system and that not subtile the twelve people chosen can result in discriminatory and discrimination and not the truth that surrounds the case and defendant. In Twelve Angry Men, Rose highlights the importance of knowing and understanding the jury system and what it involves. in that respect is a range of different jurors who have different knowledge and expectations of what is judge of the jury room and role. I never knew they locked the door is a primordial example of the awareness and insight of the jury system. Whereas Juror 11, the immigrant watchmaker seemed to be to a greater extent interested and fascinated by the juror system then those who are from America. I dont believe I have to be sure to one side or the other demonstrates the 11th jurors judgement and sagaciousness for the system and the case.Rose is able to explain the importance of understanding and the importance of the jury system and the case that is presented in front of the 12 jurors. According to Rose, the jury system is flawed and this can be demonstrated through the play of Twelve Angry Men. The play is based around the personality clashes of each of the jurors, the prejudiced and discrimination found by some of the men and the lack of knowledge and interest in the jury system by all the jurors. All these contribute to a jury system that can be seen as faulty and imperfect by Rose.Twelve Angry MenAccording to Rose, the jury system is flawed discuss Rose Kealy A jury is a body of people who are sworn to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them. This is shown and demonstrated in the play, Twelve Angry men, written by Reginald Rose. However, in the play, the jury system can be seen as flawed and imperfect. The faults in the play are displayed by the twelve juries that were selected to represent t he case presented.The lack of knowledge, prejudice and the personality clashes are all examples of the flaws in the jury system that are shown in the Twelve Angry Men. Rose was able to express that in the play During the play Twelve Angry Men, Rose finds the flaws in the personality chosen for the jury case. Rose demonstrates to the audience that the 12 juror members have very different personalties which in some circumstances work together but most of the time they create incidences and commotion. The personality clashes are mostly seen between the 3rd juror and the 8th juror God damn itIll kill him Ill kill him and Shut up, you son of a bitch shows the tension, suspense and displeasure between these two jurors. The two jurors are a huge part in the play and it is their personalities that clash the most. The tension however is not just shown between these two jurors. Do you know youre a sick man? who the hell is he to tell me that? is examples from the 9th and 10th jurors. These remarks are found throughout the play and underline the importance of needing to work together.Rose is able to point out the flaws in the jury system by not having each juror analysed before the case to learn their personalties and traits. These incidents however can relate and intertwine with the prejudice and discrimination found in the jury rooms. In Twelve Angry Men, Rose highlights the potential flaws that can be found in the jury system, where prejudice interferes and the pursuit of justice. This is shown mostly by the 3rd Juror in his unwillingness to change his initial guilty verdict and the manner in which he characterises, kids owadays. Angry Hostile . This view is held because the 3rd Juror relates to his troubled and tense relationship with his son as it corresponds to the defendants relationship with his father. It is displayed that the 3rd juror wants to punish the young boy for the pain that the jurors on pain put on him. The 3rd juror isnt look for the facts or deta ils of the case, he is just acting on his own emotions. This then leads to a fault in the jury system as the personality of one jury impacts the ability for the jurors to make a logical verdict on the case.The 10th juror also makes some assumptions in deciding the boys guilt or innocence rather than looking at the actually facts. Its those people Im tellin you they let the kids run wild up there. Well, maybe it serves em right In the play, Rose was able to point out that the flaws of the jury system and that not knowing the twelve people chosen can result in prejudiced and discrimination and not the truth that surrounds the case and defendant. In Twelve Angry Men, Rose highlights the importance of knowing and understanding the jury system and what it involves.There is a range of different jurors who have different knowledge and expectations of what is expected of the jury room and role. I never knew they locked the door is a prime example of the awareness and insight of the jury sy stem. Whereas Juror 11, the immigrant watchmaker seemed to be more interested and fascinated by the juror system then those who are from America. I dont believe I have to be loyal to one side or the other demonstrates the 11th jurors judgement and appreciation for the system and the case.Rose is able to explain the importance of understanding and the importance of the jury system and the case that is presented in front of the 12 jurors. According to Rose, the jury system is flawed and this can be demonstrated through the play of Twelve Angry Men. The play is based around the personality clashes of each of the jurors, the prejudiced and discrimination found by some of the men and the lack of knowledge and interest in the jury system by all the jurors. All these contribute to a jury system that can be seen as faulty and imperfect by Rose.