Chattanooga Ice Cream Case Essay

The battle of battle of Chattanooga trumpery Cream case shows a decline in sales for 5 consecutive years. The Division is headed by Charles Moore. Although Charles Moore was successful in hold uping aggroup up ups he seemed to have major issues with this group of vice presidents. According to the Harvard Business brushup Chattanooga crank Cream Case the aggroup was very dysfunctional they exhibited a lack of put, high in skirmish, disrespectful of each an different(prenominal) and exhibited avoidance issues with accountability. ag mathematical group members seemed to always lay blame to other member. Moore call for to be more(prenominal) emphatic in dismissing the ways of the past and the bolshy of Stay & Shop business demand to be put aside. Moore involve to give clear direction and assign responsibilities to each team member. Moore needs to convey that team cohesiveness is a must and this bequeath go a long way to help ensure no save loss of business.This paper leave behind examine how Moores leadhip advent contributed to the teams dysfunction, discuss what the group of employees themselves could do to better understand the perspectives of each other and their boss as well as make recommendations about Moore should do now to help his team usage in concert and manage conflicts more effectively. Why The Chattanooga Ice Cream Team Is Dysfunctional The Chattanooga Ice Cream team is dysfunctional for several reasons. Some of those reasons overwhelm an absence of assumption, avoidance, and not universe account subject.Also, there is a lack of freight amongst some managers. Moore is also looking for buy-in from all members for group decisions. There was no clear cut rule as to how decisions were going to be made. but put Charles Moore failed to incorporate clear operating rules. Week Fours Lecture construction High Performance Teams suggests that when managers agree on ground rules in advance, the team are much more likely to run effi ciently, this is especially professedly with the Chattanooga Ice Cream team.The Wisdom of Teams states that it is important to agree what will be done when people on the team do not destiny compatible views. Agreements should be made about how decisions will be made, how will results be measured and incentive should be given for a team to work together. The Wisdom of Teams also states that if you want a team to gel, you need to purpose team-based rewards, not just individual ones, no of these things took browse thus resulting in the dysfunction of the team. The team also failed due to short(p) counseling and lack of cohesion.This is a classic symptom of what the Chattanooga Ice Cream Division exhibits. Leading High Performance Teams suggests that during the norming and runing stage, leaders shift focus away(predicate) from tasks and towards relationships, they tell apart time to develop members and advocate the efforts of the team members, this is where the leaders lead more than manage and this is the point where the team should coalesce. Although the team never began to coalesce it seemed as though Moore what operating in this level. Team DevelopmentThe Chattanooga Ice Cream team members should began to perform exercises that would help them better understand the perspective of other team members and their boss. With focusing from Moore team members should began to foster commitment. The team should be aware of the benefits of working together to achieve communal goals. Because there is a lack of communicating members should surface to exercise information sharing but prior to doing this they should focus on rebuilding trust. Researchers suggest that Through interaction members are able to share information, generate, ideas and take part in decision making and problem solving.Team communication has been described as the backbone of a teams existence and is the crux of the task and social dimensions, of all groups (Fisher, 1970 Tyson 1989). T yson further states, For a group to come to existence, organize itself, and develop into an effective team requires to a higher built in bed all else good communication between members (p. 77). Dickinson and McIntyre (1997) state that communication is the concealment force foe all elements of teamwork actions, including team adjustment, leadership, advisement, response, support and planning. In fact, communication is considered among the close to important forecasters of team performance. (Indian Streams Research Journal, Volume 3, Issue 3, April 2013)This should be done individually with members what exhibit trust issues and then as a group. Team members should also make an inward and outward commitment to trust and when team members do openly trust, Moore should openly recognize them. Some behaviors that that luff team members are rebuilding trust openness to others ideas, critiquing idea not the person, offer assistance, self-disclosure or admittance of ones faults, asking f or feedback, etc. Some indications that team members have ot embraced commitment to rebuild trust are indifference, failing to discover confidence, withholding information important to decision making, lying, and withholding credit when it is due. closely importantly team members should make a commitment to be accountable. roughly importantly because there have been a lot of name employment and probably even lies per the Human Resource Guide one of the most difficult ways to rebuild trust would be to admit that you lie, If trust at work is damaged because you lied, you will need to admit you lied and apologize with honest, sincere, and unmistakable humility.No other solution will work to rebuild trust at work. Recommendations About How Moore Can Effectively coif Conflict Conflict is inevitable for leaders, and it exists at the root of some of their better ideas and at the core of many of their worst failures. (Shearhouse, Susan) Moore should revamp his leadership sprint in a manner that would demand his team to coalesce as team members. Moore should first take a look at what his leadership/management modal value is and then see how best to manage this group of team members. Moore should be open about his failures and began to insist that team members dramatize suit.Moore should assign clear roles and responsibilities to each team member and hold them accountable when they fail to meet his expectations. According to Everything Disc Management Style, Moore should shy away from exhibiting steadiness style of management. This style leans towards being accommodating. Being accommodating leads towards being unassertive according to the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Initially, Moore should adapt to the Dominance style of management resulting in him being direct/ dismissdid and firm. Moore should help his team set results-oriented goals.In What Great Managers Do by Buckingham, Moore should get to go by each of his vice presidents and discover what is universal and capitalize on it. If Moore would lead this team by the following guidelines I believe he will be more successful at leading the team weart fear conflict embrace it its your job. While you can try and avoid conflict (bad idea), you cannot escape conflict. The fact of the matter is conflict in the workplace is unavoidable. It will find you whether you look for it (good idea more later) or not.The ability to recognize conflict, understand the nature of conflict, and to be able to bring swift and just resolution to conflict will divine service you well as a leader the inability to do so may well be your downfall. (Forbes. com) Conclusion In order for the Chattanooga Ice Cream Division to be on the path to reclaiming its place Charles Moore is going to need to revamp his style of leadership and be assertive yet cooperative. Team members need to rebuild trust and be accountable to the mission and values of the organization.Team members must be forthcoming and offe r assistance with appraising the ideas of other team members. Most importantly the epithelial duct of communication is going to need to be reopened. In terms of team management Moore needs to assert a Dominant Style of Management, take a step back and reform the team with clear directing and expectations, setup a team charter and hold team members accountable for faltering from his expectations. Once the team begins to perform as a team should, Moore should then move on and began to lead and incorporate different management styles.According to Managing When Sparks Fly, to manage conflict, you must work through it. Avoidance is generally not an option. According to Rick Johnson, A leader has to win the hearts and minds of his management team to create a common purpose. This doesnt happen by accident. It depends on the values and beliefs that create the base of operations for how the team works together. It is imperative the leader understands these values and beliefs. They may be unspoken and linger at the subconscious level, but they do make believe individual attitudes. That is where the leaders communication skills become critical.