Are Social Networking Sites Harmful or Safe Research Paper

argon accessible Networking Sites detrimental or secure - Research piece Example2. Social Networking Sites Safe or Not? McDowell and Morda include alarming statistics that high spot the level of desegregation of brotherly networking sites in that respect ar just round 500 meg users on Facebook and more(prenominal) than 100 cardinal users on MySpace more or less the globe (1). The accumulation of such(prenominal)(prenominal) an excessive people of the area on centralized platforms has brought roughly legion(predicate) issues related to concealment and security of the kind networking users. The presence of such an extensive population of the world includes in all types of users, such as criminals, hackers etc. Earlier, net profit users were sensitive or so the in force(p)guarding of their training and flesh out or so their lives, however, the sexual climax of cordial networking sites has brought about a jerky trend resulting in influx of person-to- person learning and word of honor about integritys nonchalant lives on the various(prenominal) platforms. Users generally stick with the on-going trend and direct details about their routines and lives on such sites while macrocosm unconscious of the viable consequences of such conduct. Livingst genius and David state teenagers tend to distinguish their in-person entropy more than others since 49% of the teenagers in US disclose their shoal names and 29% provide their electronic mail addresses (6). McDowell and Morda state that level off learning about upcoming trips, childrens domesticate information and names nooky give the vindictive intent users information that might raise to harm the users and loan about dodgy instances for them, for example, robbery, kidnapping etc (3). nearly may palisade that kindly networking sites git prove to be safer and dangerous instances nookie be avoided if personal details of such nature are not shared out on the platf orm. However, McDowell and Morda stated that the privacy of an undivided is even be when others post information regarding others, intentionally or unintentionally, and besides that such posting is beyond the control of any(prenominal) individual (3). Livingstone and bracken include figures regarding the gunpoint of inclusion of two-year- ageingsters on genial networking sites and revealed that nigh half of the youthfulsters in UK between the ages of 8 and 17 stimulate a affectionate networking profile (2). quasi(prenominal) figures have been save for USA as well. The presence of such fragile and young minds on social networking sites is not safe since the cognitive content on these platforms may be inappropriate for the young viewers. Livingstone and stop also revealed that 57% of youngsters had been open to pornography and 31% of them had seen violent content on social networking sites (5). Alongside the impression to inappropriate content, social networking sites have assumption newer platforms for bullying their peers. Livingstone and Brake included results from a conform to that included 12-17 year old participants in the survey. The survey revealed that children were organism bullied roughly as frequently online as their authoritative lives since 72% children were universe bullied online and 85% were being bullied in school (6). It is argued that cyber bulling on social networking sites is not as bad as it has been portrayed since it is completely a oral attack on the victim, rather than a physical one (